The chemical BPA isn't living up to its nasty reputation.
A two-year government study of rats found that even high doses of the plastic additive produced only "minimal effects," and that these effects could have occurred by chance.
The finding bolsters the Food and Drug Administration's 2014
assessment
"[It] supports our determination that currently authorized uses of BPA continue to be safe for consumers," said Dr. Stephen Ostroff, the FDA's deputy commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine, in a
statement
The study's findings are at odds with
claims
The study results appear in a 249-page draft report released Friday by the
National Toxicology Program
BPA is found in polycarbonate plastics used to make products like water bottles and in the epoxy resins used to line some metal food cans. The chemical has long been known to weakly mimic the hormone estrogen and in the 1990s scientists showed that tiny amounts could leach out of plastic products and get into our bodies.
That touched off a heated debate about BPA's safety.
Critics of the chemical point to
numerous small studies
But studies that met the FDA's Good Laboratory Practice standards have suggested that BPA is safe at levels encountered by consumers. So the agency has approved its use on
most consumer products
The new draft report is part of an effort called
CLARITY-BPA
In the study, rats were exposed to BPA during gestation as well as after birth. Doses ranged from levels similar to those experienced by consumers to doses thousands of times higher. Researchers looked to see whether the chemical had any effect on things like growth, weight and tumor development.
And the scientists concluded that "BPA produced minimal effects." They also said that the effects they did see appeared to be "within the range of normal biological variation," meaning they could have occurred by chance.
The draft report will go through a peer review process. It is scheduled to be discussed at a
public meeting
But that report may be moot by the time it arrives.
Copyright 2018 NPR. To see more, visit
http://www.npr.org/