The idea of a single-payer health care system is getting some renewed attention in the United States as Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and some Democrats are advocating for it.
Sanders' "Medicare for All" bill was co-sponsored by 16 Democrats, including Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Cory Booker, D-N.J.
With a Republican White House and Congress, it's unlikely that a single-payer plan would pass in the near future, but the high-wattage support signals a major shift in the health care debate.
Recent polls suggest a growing number of Americans do support a single-payer system, which is the dominant model in other developed countries, including neighboring Canada.
While single-payer is defined and implemented differently in different countries, Danielle Martin, a Canadian physician, says there are a lot of misconceptions about how the plans work.
"What many Americans often don't realize about the Canadian system is that it's not a government delivered system," Martin says.
Martin, who is also vice president of medical affairs and health system solutions at the Women's College Hospital in Toronto, talked with All Things Considered host Michel Martin about how the services in Canada are paid for by the public, but delivered, in large part, by private doctors.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Interview Highlights
On what single-payer means in Canada
People often talk about so-called government run health care or socialized medicine — we don't actually have that in Canada. What we have is a system where the insurance is paid for through a public plan. The services are paid for through general taxation, but the services are not delivered by government employees. [As] a family doctor, I am not an employee of the government. I deliver my services in a very similarly looking model to Americans physicians. But instead of billing a private insurance company or billing my patients directly, I simply bill the government plan.
On the issue of long wait times and physician availability
I think its critical for people to know that when Canadians are seriously sick — when the issue is urgent — they don't wait. So this myth that people are sort of dying in the streets, waiting for care is just that is just that — a myth. Part of the reason that we know that is because our health outcomes are good. When compared to the U.S., outcomes for a whole variety of different diagnoses — including life expectancy, including infant mortality — all of these things actually, the Canadian system delivers as good or better care on average across the population than we see in the U.S.
But you are absolutely right, when people have a non-urgent issue in Canada, sometimes they wait. Sometimes they wait, in my opinion, too long. That's something we're really grappling with here is trying to figure out how we're going to deal with that.
On whether single-payer systems create a taxation burden
When we compare country to country, I think it's important that we do a complete arithmetic, and that in addition to considering taxation rates, we need to consider what Canadians are getting for their tax dollars, and what they're not having to pay for in terms of the private insurance market.
I mean here's the reality if you look internationally, the United States pays more per capita for health care than any other country in the world. You're closing in on 20 percent of your GDP in terms of what you spend. So there's a lot of money being spent publicly and privately on health care services in the U.S. It seems to me that ought to be more than enough to pay for health care for everybody.
Copyright 2017 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.
